Search
Recent Comments
    • Kimberly R. Harris on Customer service isn't quite dead yet...
      “Hi, I enjoyed reading this article. In order to stay above all the competition out here, it's very important that a small business excel in their c”
    • Jank Ovicllc on The keys to the kingdom...
      “Yes you are very right, all clients are really not comfortable with this….”
    • Justin on Financials of Santa
      “Hmm. I hate to be the legal party-pooper, but like the South Pole, the North Pole is international territory, so there aren't any labor or tax laws. Y”
    • Patti DeNucci on How brave am I?
      “You pose a great question here, Candy. And after being at the Mark Fox event you wrote of -- and being a part of the Fearless Women book and initiativ”
    • Terri Orlowski on Conference Musings for IVAA Summit #ivaa10 - changes, twitter and winning
      “I basically used Twitter to take notes... By using the hashtag, I was able to look back through the posts later and save the salient points, rather th”
Archives

You are currently browsing the archives for the Taxes category.

  • 2012 (2)
  • 2011 (2)
  • 2010 (13)
  • 2009 (41)
  • 2008 (129)
  • 2007 (82)
  • 2006 (5)

Archive for the ‘Taxes’ Category

PostHeaderIcon Get It Fast!

Tax help, that is. The IRS has invested some time and money in keeping people off their backs so they can deal with their form* problems by updating and upgrading their online resources for tax payers.

Read more here. Or, check out IRSe Publication 17 for yourself.

Like accountingweb, we here at OffAssist want to remind you that the only place for legit IRS info on the web is their website, IRS.GOV. Sites that look similar but end in anything else (.com, .net, .info, et cetera) are scams, so make sure the .gov is there before you ask questions and remember the real IRS will never ask for personal information over the web or via email unless they have already been in touch with you regarding a specific issue.

*Yes, karma came for me after I spouted about how I would not be affected by the tax form problems/delay this year. Apparently, if you or a spouse went to college at all last year and are taking advantage of the lifetime learning credit, well those forms were among those affected.

PostHeaderIcon Don’t Waste My Time!

That’s what the IRS is telling tax payers. The IRS has a number of things they consider “frivolous” when it comes to tax returns. Taxpayers filing “frivolous” returns are fined $5,000–raised from $500 by Congress in 2006.

The newest additions to the list of things you can put on your tax return if you want to pay a hefty fee include “misinterpretation of the 9th Amendment regarding objections to military spending” as well as certain specific invalid deductions related to meals.

Accounting web has the details here. Embedded in the story are links to PDFs of the other things the IRS has ruled “frivolous” in the past. I have to say, honestly, a number of them LOOK on the surface like legit reasons not to pay taxes, things like the fact the IRS Tax Code is not an actual law, etc. Both my practical and cynical sides know that these arguments are fruitless, Big Brother will win.

I am curious, though, as to the answers to these objections. I could see something like “I don’t have to pay taxes because I’m a brunette–If blondes have more fun then we brunettes ought to have less taxes,” being ruled a frivolous reason to not pay taxes, but the objections based on quasi-legal stances, those I’d like to see answered. I would also like to know why the IRS gets to decide what is a frivolous reason. That seems a slippery slope…

What if somewhere down the line they make a frivolous ruling–who will be able to stop them? For example, say the IRS decides to rule that since most people lie on their taxes they are going to rule all Americans liars and automatically add 10% to the tax amount shown on the return?

How do you argue with someone who gets to both make the rules and enforce them?

*sigh* I’m waxing political. But, just in case, better go make sure none of your favorite deductions are on any of the frivolous lists.

PostHeaderIcon Alternative Minimum Fuss

Like many, I’ve heard of the AMT – the Alternative Minimum Tax – but since it did not affect me I haven’t paid much attention to it. Apparently this particular tax was made into law in the late 60′s as a way to target a particular group of ultra-wealthy people who were using deductions to avoid to pay any income tax at all. The tax has not been adjusted over time and has gone from affecting the intended target to an ever-growing percentage of the American public at large.
Congress intended to take action on this issue this year, but was apparently delayed. A short term fix was created, a one year freeze on the growth of the AMT, but the forms for people who pay this tax were printed in November. Orginal reports indicated that updated versions of the 5 affected forms would not be available to taxpayers until February 11, 2008, putting a damper on some people’s desire to file early. As in January early.
The AMT affected about 13.5 million American taxpayers when filing their 2006 taxes. Of those, an estimated 3-4 million are traditional early filers, the people who will be affected by the delay.
For more details on the changes and a list of affected forms, check out the AP article here and the IRS’s information page here.
The IRS did recommend electronic filing as a way to increase the speed of refund processing for those affected.

PostHeaderIcon New Form 990 for 2008

Form 990 is the tax return that charities and tax-exempt organizations are required to file each year.

The IRS drafted a tentative new form in 2007 and accepted public input from the non-profit sector to make the form both more functional and easier to use.
For all the pertinent details, check out the information page about the new form on the IRS website, here.

When tax exempt organizations file their taxes in 2008, for the 2007 tax year, they will be using the old form. The new form will be used in 2009 when filing 2008 taxes.

PostHeaderIcon Money for Miles

The IRS has updated standard mileage rates for 2008. The new rates, effective for mileage incurred on or after January 1, 2008 are:

(1) Business 50.5 cents per mile
(2) Charitable contribution 14 cents per mile
(3) Medical and moving 19 cents per mile

That’s on page 2 of the excruciatingly long and grossly detailed IRS document on the subject–found HERE. You have to skim to the end, page 29 (of 30) to find the effective date. Look at all the reading time I just saved you!

PostHeaderIcon Uncle Sam Doesn’t Want You…

…to give him your opinion in exchange for a credit on your tax account. This is apparently the latest phishing scam using the IRS name & logo to try to defraud people, according to accoutingweb.

So, for the record:

A) The IRS does not ever send taxpayers unsolicited emails. That means they will never contact you via email as a first contact–they will only email you after you have been dealing with some matter and authorized them to contact you via email regarding it.

B) If you’re not sure your IRS email is legit, check out their official page on e-mail scams that use their name, found here.

C) If you do get an unsolicited email from the IRS offering you a refund on your credit card as a result of their internal records audit (um, yea, riiight..) and choose not to check it out on the IRS page above, if it is like the one I got this morning, that told me to click on the below address, it is probably not legit.

“w3.tehran.agri-jahad.ir:84/IRS…”

The words in red ought to send up a red flag, even if they are spelled wrong.

(yes, the end of the link has been cut off and no, it is not clickable, just in case someone cruises by who hasn’t had their coffee yet this morning)

PostHeaderIcon Fighting Taxes – One Dollar at a Time

Really, I just don’t know what to say.

Check out the article for yourself, about Cary Malchow of Muncie, Indiana. In a gesture of protest at rising property taxes, he paid his tax bill, all $12K + of it, in person. In coins and one-dollar bills.

There’s another article here, detailing how his protest cost his county because employees were kept late counting the cash (overtime) while under guard by sheriff’s deputies (security costs) and could not make the nightly deposit (an estimated $1100 lost in interest-for that ONE day!).

Okay, so I can think of lots of things TO say, but I think I’ll hold my tongue. I own a home in one of the most expensive (property tax-wise) places to do so. And I pay those taxes happily in lieu of a state income tax.

It is tempting to start saving change for the IRS, though. Have you SEEN the self-employment tax rate?

PostHeaderIcon Lucky Catch?

Maybe not.

The 21-year-old college student who caught Barry Bonds record-breaking home run ball may be in for a world of trouble with the IRS.

Tax lawyers fall squarely around the issue, some going with the common sense approach that, although the ball is estimated to be worth over $500,000 at auction, the ball is not income until it is sold.

Others claim the ball is taxable immediately, the same way treasure found diving in U.S. coastal waters is.

Still others claim that it is both immediately taxable (for approximately $210,000 in taxes based on estimated worth of $600,000) and subject to long-term capital gain taxes if the young fan waits more than a year to sell his prize.

Then there’s the question of how to determine the initial investment value of a ball the man caught for free…

For more on this silly (yet scary, and the IRS is refusing to comment thus far) tax question, check out the articles below:

WSJ Law Blog: Barry Bonds’ Ball

WSJ Journal Online: The Big Catch Could Have a Big Catch

TheStar.com: Mets fan could face big tax bill for snagging Bonds’ ball

KITV Honolulu: Fan Might Not Sell Bonds’ Historic Ball

PostHeaderIcon Tell Me Your Tax Problems

That’s what the IRS is saying according to this article from accountingweb.

The gist of it that the IRS is asking businesses to report frequently disputed or controversial tax issues to their Industry Issue Resolution (IIR) Program.

The important fact is that the deadline for submitting an issue for the fall reviews is August 31, 2007. More information can be found on the IRS website. The program has been in use since 2000 and has resulted in 25 determinations – decisions helping clarify how tricky tax situations should be handled.

IIR Submission Procedures

Overview of the IIR Program

PostHeaderIcon IRS Seeks In-Depth Info

The IRS is proposing changes to how corporations and partnerships report their taxes. As I understand it, they are basically asking for more in-depth ownership information from these types of business entities.

As I understood it, the gist is that the government wants to know the names and numbers of anyone who owns more than 10% of the stock in a corporation and more than 10% interest in a partnership. They also want to know from the corporations and partners what businesses or assets they (they being the corporate or partnership entity) own more than 10% of.

To my non-tax person’s eyes this looks like a way to clean up dodgy tax reporting and offshore tax shelters since the new forms will require reporting of both foreign and domestic ownership.

The good news is that these new forms appear to only apply to large, complex entities. There are income thresholds involved, both for those who would have to use the new forms, and a new minimum that will (slightly) decrease the amount of tax paperwork smaller businesses have to file.

After a bit of digging around on the IRS website I was unable to find the original press release. I’m sure there was one because the two articles I read on the subject, at accountingweb and at smbiz.com, read identically, nearly word-for-word.

Both the above linked articles have links to the proposed forms on the IRS website. If adopted, these forms would kick in for tax years ending on or after 12/31/08. The IRS is accepting public input and commentary on the new forms until 9/14/07.

IRS Tax Info for Partnerships Page

IRS Tax Info for Corporations Page

Both of the above have links to the new forms, too.